CHICA-Canada
 
09Conference
   

 

BRIEF TO THE NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SARS AND PUBLIC HEALTH

July 30 2003

CHICA–Canada is a national, multidisciplinary, voluntary association of health care professionals.  CHICA–Canada is committed to improving the health of Canadians by promoting excellence in the practice of infection prevention and control through education, communication, standards, research and consumer awareness.

CHICA–Canada is comprised of nineteen chapters.  This year, the Thunder Bay Chapter hosted the annual education conference, with 300 attendees from Canada, the United States, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Austria, Germany and Japan

 Recent world events have underscored the vital importance of the work of Infection Prevention and Control Professionals, and the need to ensure infection control expertise, resources and infrastructure across the health care continuum - acute care, long term care, public health and the community. CHICA Canada has determined that 250,000 nosocomial infections occur each year and that between 8,000 and 12,000 people die directly or indirectly from these infections every year. SARS clearly revealed how flimsy our infection control and prevention is in Canadian hospitals.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. Increased resources with Infection Control Professionals in every health care facility.  Health Canada, with input from CHICA–Canada experts, developed a resource model for infection prevention and control programs which recommends three full time equivalent infection control professionals per 500 beds in acute care hospitals, and one full time equivalent infection control professional per 150-250 beds in long term care facilities.

2. Standards for the number of Infection Control Professionals through the Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation. The "RICH" Resources for Infection Control In Hospitals Study surveyed hospitals across Canada for their infection control program components with respect to surveillance, resources and control and outcomes. The results indicated that there was large variability, inadequate surveillance and less than ideal control efforts with very thin resources. Hospitals who undertake surveillance at a higher level have fewer infections with Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other related problems.

3. Hospital infection prevention and control uses many tools to get the job done (microbiology, epidemiology, molecular biology, basic public health principles etc). We must not make the mistake of burying hospital infection prevention and control within the public health portfolio.

4. Integrated system wide infection control and prevention program. Patients require coordination of care as they move from institutions to other health care sectors. The need for Infection Control resources in health care agencies and the community is paramount. 

5. Creation of Provincial Centres for Infectious Diseases.  For example, creation of an Ontario Center for Infectious Diseases (OCID) that is mandated to manage community and hospital infection control matters, research, epidemiology and control etc. This OCID could be distributed across all of Ontario's academic health science centers as that is where the intellectual resources are centralized and can interact for training, research and advancement of the cause. This is where the academic hospitals and teaching health units are that do most of the leading edge infection control development.

6. Timely dissemination of information by a central agency, such as the e-mail distribution capability of the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control.

7. Funding to the Health Canada Population and Public Health Branch’s Nosocomial and Occupational Infections Bureau should match that of the US CDC hospital infection program on a per capita basis. This funding should be used to initiate national surveillance and standard setting in infection control and prevention. It should build upon the existing Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance program. Current funding for this essential work is embarrassingly low.

8. Standards for infection control programs should be set nationally for all health care facilities. Establishing these should be linked to federal health transfer payments or other mechanism to ensure they are implemented.

9. A federal research program into the prevention and control of nosocomial infections including SARS should be established with $20 million dollars over 10 years.

10. Each school of Medicine and Nursing should be provided with $500,000-$1,000,000 per year for 5 years to establish and maintain faculty wide training programs for the prevention of nosocomial infections and control of antibiotic over use.

11. The federal government should host an international SARS scientific meeting in the fall of 2003 and again in 2004. It should be open to all scientists and practitioners who wish to come (i.e. should not be by invitation only but be run in the same way other professional associations such as CHICA–Canada run their annual scientific meetings).

Community and Hospital Infection Control Association –  Canada

CHICA–Canada
PO Box 46125 RPO Westdale
Winnipeg MB  R3R 3S3
Telephone: 204-897-5990/866-999-7111
Fax:  204-895-9595
chicacanada@mts.net
www.chica.org